Thursday, June 2, 2016

Villagers affected by dams built by Chinese company

Villagers affected by dams built by Chinese company Sinohydro Meanchey later this week demanded that the company provide adequate compensation to them after their agricultural crops in hundreds of hectares affected.

Mr. Duong mainland residents from villages or communes physical eggs District told VOA (VOD) on Sunday that agricultural crops in hundreds of hectares of villagers will be damaged if the company closed the dam.

He said about 100 villagers had gathered to protest in front of a local Chinese company Kal Oddar Meanchey province to require administrators Chinese company Sinohydro provide compensation to shut them before backwater dams in the rainy season.

Aout Nga a citizen who attended the protest, also said that cassava and voices float his neck can provide income to him thousands of dollars per hectare, but he said authorities have been informed of the impact to the population with no compensation it.

The citizens demanded the authorities to intervene to China market to provide appropriate compensation to them in exchange to the damage that will occur in the future.

About 100 people turned out to protest 2 days while dozens of heavily armed security forces were deployed not far from where residents complain.

Protect the rights group Adhoc, Oddar Meanchey province, Ms. Randall said that the dam will not only affect agricultural crops forest villagers, but also affects the forest One hundred hectares.

He said authorities should intervene to impact China are responsible for providing compensation to them for their land in agriculture continue.

Governor of Oddar Meanchey province, said officials are studying the impact that will end at the beginning of next month. He said that after receiving the results from this study inter-ministerial committee will provide compensation from reality.

The lawyer tried to explain that the legal defense team on May 24 sent a letter to representatives of the prosecution why Kem Sokha, refused to comment because he has immunity. Defence case that prosecutors could not charge their clients under Article 538.

Alternatively, a team of lawyers brought up the offense obvious as provided for in Article 86 of the Criminal Procedure specify that the offense being committed recently committed then immediately suspect was public shouting denh_brapheab_chab_braphing individuals found objects or traces or clues clear and consistent, the other led them to conclude that the person has committed or participated commit crimes.

The letter stated that specific offense or judicial police No one has the right to arrest offenders on the spot or denh_brapheab_chab_braphing offense and the evidence necessary to keep evidence from protected place.

The lawyers claimed the case of Kem Sokha represent the prosecution can make submission to the investigating judge for alleged flagrant offense.

No comments:

Post a Comment