Acting President of the National Salvation Party President Kem Sokha was deputy prosecutor of Phnom Penh Municipal Court accused of offenses obvious to Article 538 of the Criminal and Article 86 of the Criminal Procedure as he entered not to appear in court on two occasions from subpoena during May as regards Case romance.
In a letter dated May 30, sent to the president of Phnom Penh Municipal Court lawyer 5 have Sam Kong, Chan Chen and Mr. Socheatvong also wrote that represents the prosecution tried to enter the case a client, they go to in Article 538 and Article 86 to make way authorities could arrest Mr. Kem Sokha, the defense team that made the wrong legal proceedings sharing this Constitution and violation of immunity MPs.
The lawyer tried to explain that the legal defense team on May 24 sent a letter to representatives of the prosecution why Kem Sokha, refused to comment because he has immunity. Defence case that prosecutors could not charge their clients under Article 538.
Alternatively, a team of lawyers brought up the offense obvious as provided for in Article 86 of the Criminal Procedure specify that the offense being committed recently committed then immediately suspect was public shouting denh_brapheab_chab_braphing individuals found objects or traces or clues clear and consistent, the other led them to conclude that the person has committed or participated commit crimes.
The letter stated that specific offense or judicial police No one has the right to arrest offenders on the spot or denh_brapheab_chab_braphing offense and the evidence necessary to keep evidence from protected place.
The lawyers claimed the case of Kem Sokha represent the prosecution can make submission to the investigating judge for alleged flagrant offense.
Phnom Penh Municipal Court spokesman Sous asked to comment, he said it was not received details.
But a lawyer is Hem National defense Kem Sokha said that they are studying further legal Assembly to improve the legal and judicial mechanisms.
He said: "Step 1 were gathered lawyers to resolve legal."
By letter dated May 24. The lawyer argued that the Criminal Procedure Code, prosecutors are not given any authority to force witnesses to clarify the inevitable.
They said phase Preliminary investigations as the case that the courts are on the way this procedure represents the prosecution does not have any authority as stated in the Code of Criminal Procedure to use force public to force a client they are Kem Sokha to enter address or bring it.
Meanwhile, not to appear in court by summons lawyers that their client's deputies have parliamentary immunity would encourage law enforcement to abide by the Constitution.
news
No comments:
Post a Comment